Chefman Obliterator
Designing for Intelligent Automation
The Chefman Obliterator represented a significant advancement in the premium kitchen appliance category as part of the company's ambitious "Tier One" initiative.
My role as lead UX designer was to create an interface for a blender that could intelligently detect and achieve ideal consistency without constant user monitoring—a challenging proposition that required balancing sophisticated technology with intuitive controls.
The centerpiece of this innovation was the Auto-Blend functionality, which uses weight sensing and algorithmic processing to determine the optimal consistency for whatever is being blended.
My responsibility was to develop a control scheme that made this advanced technology accessible while maintaining consistency with Tier One's distinctive brutalist design language.
The Design Challenge
Creating an intuitive interface for the Obliderator presented several unique challenges:
- How can I clearly communicate the Auto-Blend functionality to first-time users?
- How can I incorporate automated features with manual control options within a minimalist design language?
- How can I maintain the Tier One design principles while ensuring optimal usability and safety?
User Research Insights
I began by conducting comparative analysis of premium blenders across the market, focusing specifically on how different brands implemented pulse functionality and automated features.
I also facilitated user sessions with both casual and power users of blenders to understand their mental models and expectations.
Key insights from this research included:
- Users primarily want "set it and forget it" functionality for common blending tasks but desire precise control for specialty applications
- Users expect clear feedback about which mode was active and what would happen when they engaged a control
- Safety concerns were paramount, particularly around unexpected blade activation
These insights guided my approach to developing control schemes that would honor both our minimalist design principles and users' expectations for clarity and safety.
UIÂ Layout & Blender Setup
Aligning with our Tier One design language, this approach used a single dial as the main control scheme for this unit.
While aesthetically striking, user testing revealed significant cognitive load when the same control handled too many distinct functions with different interaction patterns.
We needed to maintain as minimal of a display as possible in order to not overwhelm users.
Selecting a function
With the primary step in setting up a blending session being selecting the preset or manual speed that the user wants to use, I opted to set turning the knob as the method of traversing through the different options available.
The initial direction for the menu items was to have them illuminate as independent LEDs, but hardware constraints required a change in direction, and so a printed dot was added to align with which menu item is highlighted.
Communicating Expected Action
In addition to the change in display of the Segmented Display, with the dial button controlling both the Start Blend and Stop actions of the blender, we wanted to clearly communicate to the user when pressing the button what action would occur
Error State: Add Liquid
After running through some of the error states we needed to account for with this unit, the Culinary team mentioned that one of the more commonly recurring issues is that not enough liquid is added to the blender for unit to properly create a smoothie.
Instead of communicating this with an error code that users would need to consult the user manual for to get more information, I instead opted to include this as its own LED, since it's an error state that users can quickly and easier amend on their own.
Error State: Fix Jar
The other most common issue that users are likely to run into is that their blender jar may not be properly fixed onto the unit.
In order to prevent any damage to the unit, the Fix Jar LED is displayed as soon as the jar is not detected in place, and the LED is programmed to blink on and off — and the blender will remain in standby — if the user attempts to begin blending before the issue is fixed.
Pulse Function Exploration
The Pulse function presented a particular challenge that required multiple design iterations to resolve effectively.
Option #1: Press and Hold Dial Button
Initially I opted to use the center dial button as a press-and-hold mechanism for Pulse activation when the Pulse option is selected.
Issue: Extended user testing revealed ergonomic issues with this solution. The perpendicular orientation of the dial made it uncomfortable for users to maintain pressure for the duration needed for effective pulsing, forcing them to choose between optimal blending results and physical comfort.
Option #2: Spring-Loaded Dial Position
For my next iteration, I designed the Pulse function as the furthest left position on the dial, functioning as a spring that would activate when turned to that position and deactivate when released.
Issue: User testing revealed significant problems with this approach. Users had no advance warning that the blades would activate immediately upon reaching the Pulse position, since all other options around the dial required the button press to start blending, creating both an off-putting surprise and a safety concern.
Option #3: Dedicated Pulse Switch
Despite the Tier One design philosophy emphasizing dial-centric interfaces, I ultimately recommended a dedicated trigger switch for the Pulse function.
Rationale:
- Clear affordance for the function's purpose
- Ergonomic comfort during extended use
- Intuitive operation without explanation
Communicating Status: Auto-Blend
The feedback display during Auto-Blend operation presented another significant design challenge. I evaluated several approaches to communicate blend status to users:
Since Auto-Blend was poised to be the one of the major selling points of the unit, I explored several approaches to communicating the blend status to users:
Option #1: Approximated Countdown Timer
Initially, I explored displaying an estimated blend time countdown, showing users approximately how long the process would take.
Issue: During testing, I discovered this created false expectations. Since the Auto-Blend function optimally finishes when the desired consistency is detected— not when a timer reaches zero— users became confused when blending stopped before the countdown ended or continued past zero. Some users even suspected the unit was malfunctioning.
Option #2: Fixed Countdown Timer
Next I considered a fixed estimated countdown, that would ensure the blender continued running until the timer reached zero, regardless of detected consistency.
Issue: This approach undermined the core value proposition of the Auto-Blend feature— its ability to intelligently determine optimal consistency. It would potentially over-process some ingredients while failing to properly blend others.
Option #3: 'Active Indicator' Without Time Estimation
The solution I ultimately implemented uses animation to show the blender is actively running and monitoring consistency without making potentially inaccurate time predictions.
Rationale:
- Maintains trust in the Auto-Blend technology's ability to determine the blender's runtime
- Prevents confusion that could stem from an estimated countdown timer
Extra: Sensing The Contents of the Blender
At the start of the Auto-Blend function, the unit needs a few seconds to first gauge the amount of resistance that the contents
Rationale: We wanted to communicate that this state differs from the actual Auto-Blend state, since the blades spin significantly slower than when blending, and we wanted to ensure that users do not misinterpret this as the unit not functioning properly.
Implementation and Impact
The Crispinator's commercial success has been equally impressive. The product is now stocked nationwide at Walmart and Costco, representing a significant expansion of Chefman's retail presence in the premium small appliance category.
Further validating our design approach, the Obliterator won the 2024 Red Dot Design Award for Best Design Concept.
The award jury specifically recognized the product's intuitive user interface and minimalist brutalist aesthetic, writing:
"The Chefman® Obliterator™ is a game- changer in the kitchen. Imagine a blender with a revolutionary jar design that channels ingredients to precision blades, all powered by a robust motor and efficient airflow system for quiet blending.
...With a striking brutalist design and an intuitive knob offering both preset and manual settings, the Obliterator™ combines ease of use with aesthetic elegance, seamlessly fitting into any kitchen decor.
...Experience the perfect blend of style and performance with the Chefman® Obliterator™, where innovation meets sophistication."
This recognition from one of the design industry's most respected awards programs underscores how the integration of thoughtful UX design with bold aesthetic vision created a genuinely differentiated product in a crowded market.
Lessons Learned
This project reinforced several valuable principles that continue to inform my approach to UX design:
- Function over form when safety is concerned - While aesthetic consistency matters, user safety and ergonomic comfort must take priority
- Intelligent features need intelligent explanations - Advanced technology requires thoughtful communication design to make capabilities clear to users
- Physical controls benefit from physical affordances - Different functions often benefit from different types of controls that match their operation
- Test with realistic scenarios - The ergonomic issues with the pulse button only emerged during extended testing sessions that mimicked real usage
Conclusion
The Chefman Obliterator project demonstrates the complex balance required when designing interfaces for intelligent appliances.
By methodically testing different control schemes and being willing to make pragmatic adjustments to our design philosophy when needed, I created an interface that makes sophisticated technology accessible while maintaining a distinctive premium aesthetic.
The success of this approach has validated the importance of putting user needs first, even when that occasionally means introducing design elements that weren't initially envisioned.
This flexible approach to implementing our design language has strengthened rather than diluted the Tier One product identity, creating a cohesive family of products that share core principles while adapting thoughtfully to the specific requirements of each appliance category.
Want to work together?